|
Michael-Smith-US-Air-Force-Radar Controler2m31s.wma
Getuige Michael Smith
Overgenomen en vertaald uit UFO Magazine juli 2001 door Paul Harmans ( www.ufowijzer.nl ) Mijn naam is Michael Smith. Ik was sergeant bij de luchtmacht van 1967 tot 1973. Ik was daar luchtverkeersleider. Tijdens mijn diensttijd in Klamath Falls, Oregon vroeg in 1970 arriveerde ik bij de radarafdeling terwijl ze een UFO bekeken die op de radar te zien was. Hij hing stil op zo’n 80.000 voet. Ik zat daar zo’n 10 minuten waarna het langzaam begon te bewegen en plotseling na zo’n 5 a 10 minuten van de radar verdween. Bijna tegelijkertijd verscheen het weer
stationair op 80.000 voet. Het stond dan stil voor zo’n 10 minuten en herhaalde dan de voorgaande bewegingen nog twee maal. Toen ik uitzocht wat de procedure was als je een UFO waarnam werd me verteld dat ik NORAD moest inlichten. Het was niet noodzakelijk iets op te schrijven en je hield het voor jezelf. Het was een “enkel nodig om te weten” onderwerp. NORAD belde me later in het jaar op een nacht om mij te laten weten dat er een UFO richting Californische kust kwam. Ik vroeg hen wat ik moest doen met dit geval. Ze zeiden: “Niets schrijf er niks van op kijk alleen naar boven”. Later in 1972 toen ik gestationeerd was bij het 53ste, een radarsquadron in Michigan, ontving ik een paar paniekerige telefoontjes van politieagenten die drie UFO’s achtervolgden. Dus ik controleerde meteen de radar en die bevestigde dat ze er inderdaad waren. Ik belde NORAD en die werden bezorgd omdat ze twee inkomende B-52’s hadden. Ze lieten ze een omweg maken omdat ze ze niet in de nabijheid wilde hebben.Die nacht beantwoorden ik veel telefoontjes van het politiebureau en de staatspolitie.
Mijn standaard antwoord was “er was niets op de radar te zien”. Ik wil dit onder ede verklaren op een hoorzitting van het congres.
Dank u.
Michael Smith: US Air Force Radar Controller
De regering, zij houden alles geheim. Zij willen niet dat iemand er over praat. Maar dit is zo.n opvallende technologie. Deze mensen komen van wie weet waar vandaan. Ik zou denken dat je dat iedereen zou willen laten weten.
Na een persoonlijke opmerking, nadat de eerste gebeurtenis in Oregon plaatsvond, kwam ik thuis met verlof en vertelde mijn vader hierover. Hij werd door en door rood, wit en paars . een oude held uit de 2e Wereldoorlog en daarbij zeer vaderlandslievend. Ik vertelde hem over die UFO's die we regelmatig zien en hij zei: Nee, de regering zegt dat er geen UFO's zijn.. Ik zei: .Papa, ik heb ze met mijn eigen ogen op de radar gezien.. En hij zei: .Kom op, de regering zou hem nooit voorliegen.. Snap je. Maar dit is zijn zoon; ik zou hem geen leugens vertellen. Dus, hij weet niet wat hij moet doen. Jaren later, na het Watergate schandaal, zei hij tegen mij: Ga zitten en vertel me alles. De regering liegt met die Watergate zaak, dus waarschijnlijk zullen ze ook over iets belangrijks liegen..
www.disclosureproject.org
--o-o-o--
Mr. Michael W. Smith, US Air Force November 2000 Michael Smith was an Air Traffic Controller with the Air Force in Oregon and, subsequently, in Michigan. At both of these facilities he and others witnessed UFOs tracked on radar and moving at extraordinary speeds. He also confirms that personnel were expected to maintain secrecy concerning these observations, and that NORAD, the North American Air Defense Command, was fully apprised of these events. In fact, in one event in Michigan, NORAD was fully engaged, and steered B-52s returning to base around these UFOs. My name is Michael W. Smith. I was in the Air Force from 1969 to 1973 and was an Aircraft Control and Early Warning Operator, which was basically an Aircraft Control person. Our job was to track and give altitudes for military aircraft, and to detect and identify any incoming aircraft coming into our airspace. In spring of 1970, while I was stationed in Klamath Falls, Oregon. I came up to the radar site on the evening shift, and where there [were] normally two or three people in the radar room, there [were] quite a few, from the cooks to maintenance - all kinds of people. I asked what was going on, and they said that they were watching a UFO on radar. I immediately was stunned and asked if the Pentagon [had been] notified or if we [had] called the President. They said no, they don’t do that. And I said, well, we should call the news media or, you know, call somebody - this was Earth-shaking news to me. And they said, “No, just calm down.” NORAD [North American Air Defense Command] knows about it. They had called NORAD. The senior NCO pulled me to the side and said that NORAD knows about it - that’s the only people we notify. We don’t talk about this. We don’t tell anybody about this. The people that know, know. We just watch, see what happens, and that’s it. That’s our job. I insisted there has to be a report filed or something filed, you know? And he said that there is a report that you can file - it’s about an inch thick, and the first two pages are about the sighting. The rest of it is basically a psychological profile of you, your family, your bloodlines, everything. When the Air Force goes through it, they can discredit you completely by either saying that [you were] on drugs, or your mother was a communist, or anything to discredit you. You’d never get a promotion, and [you’d] spend the next three and one-half years up at the North Pole, living in a tent, checking the weather balloons. You know - no hope for promotion. So, the message was pretty loud and clear: you just shut-up and don’t say anything to anybody. This UFO was stationary, wasn’t moving at all. Then it would slowly lower itself down until it got behind a mountain so that you lost radar contact. It would stay down for about 15 minutes, and the next thing you knew, it was right back up there at 80,000 [or] 90,000 feet. Then, [in] the next sweep of the radarscope, it would be 200 miles away, stationary - completely stopped. It would hover there for 5 [or] 10 minutes, and then slowly start descending until it dropped off radar. Then it would come back up. It did this three times, that I saw. This happened one more time that I know of. I heard that it’s not an infrequent occurrence out there. They have them quite often, but I’ve personally seen it twice. There’s no aircraft that can accelerate and decelerate that fast without having the pilot’s face go through the windshield. I mean it is impossible to operate that way with gravity... So, it was obviously something we didn’t have. We never scrambled interceptors on them, so it was obviously something the Russians never had. It was a UFO. That’s the only explanation there was for it. NORAD knew about it and they just handled it like it’s just a UFO - watch it and see what happens. Don’t take any actions, don’t tell anybody, don’t write it down, and don’t disclose it. NORAD is in charge of all of the air space of the United States and North America. It’s their job to identify any incoming aircraft, any threats - Russian planes or any aircraft at all. The first thing they do is check it with the flight plans of airlines or private carriers or whatever. Everything is identified, so when something like this just pops up on the scope with no flight plan and doing erratic behaviors, it’s their job to identify it. They have a tie-in with all the radar stations in North America. It all goes to Cheyenne Mountain, CO [NORAD HQ]. They have a big screen and they can see any area of the country at any time. Another experience I had happened on third shift. I was on the radar, and NORAD called me and informed me that there was a UFO coming up the California coast and it would be in my area pretty soon. I said what do you want me to do? And they said, “Nothing, just watch it, don’t write it down.” We have a log book in which we are supposed to keep track of anything out of the ordinary. But they said, “Don’t log it or anything, just watch it. We are just letting you know - heads up.” NORAD was well aware, obviously, that these UFOs were around, and the action of the people when I first saw the UFO on radar was as if it happens quite often. The first time you see a UFO on radar you realize the Government knows about this, so why aren’t they telling the press? But when I was pulled to the side, it was explained that, yes, there are UFOs. Yes, we know [about] them. Yes, NORAD knows about them. But that’s it. This is a secret. You are not supposed to talk about it. Don’t tell anybody about it. Don’t make any reports. Don’t write it down. Just shut-up and you’ll get your next stripe, and you’ll be promoted, and we’ll go on from there. Another encounter happened while I was stationed in Michigan. It was in 1972 - I believe it was in the fall of 1972. I was working alone that night. By then I was promoted to a Sergeant. I got a phone call from the switchboard operator, and he said he had the State Police on the phone and they wanted to talk to me. He was real frantic when he got on the phone, and said that there [were] three UFOs over the north tower of the Mackinac Bridge. Mackinac Bridge connects the upper peninsula and the lower peninsula of Michigan. I immediately turned on the radar, but my immediate reply to the officer was [that] they are not on radar, and I hung up the phone. It’s just something that’s programmed into you - that’s what you are supposed to say, “There’s nothing on radar”, even if you see something. But actually, the north tower seemed to be a little bit bigger, and then I realized that they were the UFOs. One took off, left the other two, circled Mackinac Island and came back to the other [two]. Then all three started going along Interstate 75, north from St. Ignace. In the meantime, I got calls from the Sheriff’s Department. They were frantic, saying, “We are chasing these UFOs up the highway.” My response was, there’s nothing on radar. Several people called - several civilians. I believe there was a newspaper person that called. In the meantime, I called NORAD and told them. They looked it up and they said, “Oh, they are going up I-75?” I said yes, at about 70-80 miles an hour. Now, about halfway between St. Ignace and [unintelligible], there is Kincheloe Air Force Base, which is a SAC base [closed in 1977]. They have B-52 bombers. They had two that were on final approach, and that crosses I-75. Apparently, they diverted those two bombers because they didn’t want - [whether] they have nuclear weapons or not - to take a chance on them meeting UFOs about the same altitude, crossing the highway. So they diverted the two B-52s. As the UFOs came closer, I realized that they were coming this way - following the highway right by my radar site, which is up on top of a hill. Then I saw a bright bluish glow go by silently, followed by the flashing red and blue lights of the police cars that were chasing them. If I had said, oh, yes, I have them on radar, then the next thing I know, newspapers are going to be up there wanting to talk to me and I’d probably get courtmartialed… It was just instinct, saying there’s nothing on radar when there actually was. I was watching them come up the highway. They were so close together, they looked like one return. In other words, it looked like it was one aircraft and it was very low. It doesn’t matter if he’s wearing a badge or not - you don’t talk about it. In the log book, [I] wrote this down, and I told my Senior NCO the next day about it - but that’s all you are supposed to do. Don’t tell anybody else. Don’t write it down, although I did write it down. But, I doubt you’ll ever find that log book. The government, they cover up. They don’t want anybody talking about it. But this is such remarkable technology. These people come from who knows where. I would think you’d want everybody to know… On a personal note, after the first event happened in Oregon, I came home on leave and told my Dad about it. He was red, white, and blue through and through--an old WWII hero and all that, and very patriotic. I was explaining to him about these UFOs that we routinely see out there, and he said, “No, the Government says that there are no UFOs.” I’m saying, Dad, I’ve seen these on radar with my own eyes. And he says, come on, the Government would never lie to him. You know? But here’s his son; I would never lie to him. So, he just didn’t know what to do. It wasn’t until years later, until after Watergate, that he said, “Hey, sit down and tell me about this. The Government is lying to me about a little thing like Watergate, so obviously they are out lying about something big.” It’s a Government cover-up that doesn’t need to be here any more. There is no more Cold War. I believe the same thing Dr. Greer does, that the technology they have could enable us to stop burning our fossil fuels and stop the damage to the ozone, etc. These people have technologies - they must have something. And the Government knows about it. They have these aliens, they have these spacecraft, they have this technology, all this. There’s a lot of back-engineered technology, that’s pretty obvious. Who are they to cover this up when other Governments are coming forward, admitting, and showing their files - why isn’t our Government? While I was in the Air Force, there were a number of other people that had witnessed UFOs on radar, also. A number of pilots I’ve talked to had chased them or come close to them or flown in formation with them. For example, a friend of mine was in a tower and there was a flight of three interceptors coming in. And he said, “No, there’s four of them.” And the Captain is going, “No, there’s three of us.” And he said, “Well, look around.” Sure enough, there was a UFO flying in formation with them. When Dr. Greer brought us down to Washington, D.C. for the Congressional briefing [in April 1997], I was very nervous. I didn’t know what to expect. However, there were about 12 other people there that really amazed me. My story is very tame compared to what they’ve experienced and what they’ve encountered. It was a real eye-opener, how deep this secrecy goes, how deep the cover-up is - everyone from astronauts to senators who know that there’s something going on.
|
What are the most important &convincing (ignored) UFO-FACTS ?(selection by John Kuhles)
(CIA-FBI-NSA-ONI-Pentagon etc.) released through the Freedom Of Information Act: www.caus.org & www.blackvault.com
02. Worldwide UFO-testemonies from Militairy-Police-Pilots-Radar-Operators+Air-Traffic-Controllers www.narcap.org - www.prufos.co.uk - www.disclosureproject.org
(M.O. Defense 1999-2002) 06. USAF Blue Book Special Report 14 (1969)U.S. Airforce Project 'Blue Book' Huge Catalog of 1,500 UFO's Project BLUE BOOK UFO Unknowns (xxxxx.pdf file: 683Kb) Acrobat Reader needed
07. United Nations UFO-Report (14-july-1978):
08. European Parlement UFO-Report (1990-1993)
10. Worldwide UFO-films & foto's & Physical Trace Cases (CE II)Center for Physical Trace Research To the best of our knowledge, Ted R. Phillips is the best specialty researcheron the subject of UFO trace cases in the world, and no website covers the subject better. Features include mission statement, current cases, video clips & video cam, background, media updates and cases of "high strangeness" (one of our favorite USAF terms!).
11. 'The UFO Briefing Document - Best Available Evidence'dat in 1995 aan zo'n duizend personen wereldwijd is gestuurd en de Sturrock Workshop1997, die beide werden gesponsord door miljonair Laurance Rockefeller.
Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions)
in section B-39
of the DoD (Department of Defense)
Since July 2001 the US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)is for the first time including a paragraph about UFO reports in its Aeronautical Information Manual ( AIM).UFO reporting Air Force instructions are in Section 6, par. 7-6-4, Safety, Accident, and Hazard Reports
13. American Institute of Astronautics, Kuenttner UFO-Rapport: 1970 UFO-GOVERNMENT-HEARINGS 29-July-1968
On March 10, 1982:the House of Lords held its second debate on UFOs, still coming to no definitive conclusion.
1983: The British government starts to release DECLASSIFIED UFO files for the first time.
AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA STILL IGNORES THE CONTENT of these Government, AirForce, Navy & Military declassified Top Secret UFO-Documents thus keeping the general public uninformed
WHY ??? real freedom of information is needed in a true democracy, no freedom of information creates a fake democracy! no freedom of information = no real free CHOICE !
Above Top Secret Timothy Good This was one of the first books that I read and it is still one of the best. Tim Good presents his points of view in a very clear and concise manner. The book deals with the way in which various governments have tried to cover-upthe UFO phenomena from the public. The book contains loads of smaller cases from around the globe from mostly military personnel and pilots, people who would in general be less likely to lie, mis-identify etc. regarding the objects that they have been seeing. Most of these cases are backed up by official documents and testimony from the various governments and witnesses. I believe that this was one of the first books (if not the 1st) to publish details of the Majestic-12 documents.
dat is wat de meeste journalisten steeds maar weer vragen: "gelooft u in ..." alsof het allemaal maar "vaag" is
Alsof er "niets" valt te -weten- of spelen ze dom ? (...) wat is dan erger ?
small selection of the 450+ testimonies of deep insiders
(dear media, if only 1 below here is true, it is enough!)
(patience with loading, geduld met laden)
|


CLICK ON / KLIK OP ONDERSTAANDE PLAATJE:
Use Translator to translate into YOUR language
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/Dutch.html

wat is de beste houding tegenover
"dubieuze" & controversiële
"Real-X-Files" info ???
o.a. -standaard- SLEUTELZINNEN gebruiken
(die Stichting Skepsis amper gebruikt)
in communicatie met wie dan ook, voor een
OPEN & EERLIJKE (!)
discussie (eventueel uitwisseling):
01.
"voor zover mijn kennis reikt ..."
02.
"Als ik goed voorgelicht ben ... dan ..."
03.
"tot nu toe, is mij bekend dat ..."
04.
"Als mijn bronnen correct zijn ... dan ..."
05.
"zover ik kan oordelen over ..."
06.
"Als het 100% vrij is van desinformatie... dan ..."
07.
"Als het geen verborgen agenda's bevat... dan..."
08.
"zover het verifieerbaar & controleerbaar is dan..."
09.
"zolang het vrij is van zelfcensuur, dan ..."
10.
"Als maar een DEEL de waar is, dan ..."
11. "Als mijn bevattingsvermogen het toelaat, dan ..."
12. "Als het niet slecht & zwaar selectief is samengevat, dan ..."
13. "Als het vrij is van negatieve wishful thinking door (pseudo) sceptici, dan..."
14. "Als ik voldoende zin heb, tijd vrijmaak & moeite WIL doen, dan ..."
ze zijn zo "zeker" van zichzelf, dat ze de belangrijkste ingrediënt om
zichzelf een ECHTE scepticus te mogen noemen, missen, namelijk:
gezonde dosis zelf-twijfel !!!
UFO pseudo sceptici kennnen
geen grenzen in gemakzucht & arrogantie:
- als het
effe kan, graag liever niet moeite doen, om verder te kijken.
- slecht tot zeer slecht samenvatten
(meestal van ANDERE subjectieve samenvattingen)
- alleen het aannemelijke voor "waar" aannemen (en denken dat je
daarmee zekerheid
hebt)
- zoeken naar fouten om zo het -hele- onderwerp af te doen als "zie je wel"
dat het "allemaal" onzin is.
- film & media de schuld geven
dat "ZIJ de oorzaak zijn" dat er meer UFO-meldingen binnenkomen.
incest, verkrachting binnen het huwelijk,
wereldwijde pedofiele priesters, asbest affaire,
etc. etc.
"bestaan zeker ook niet" als de media & film er melding van maakt.
ALLE -nieuwe- meldingen van zogenaamde "niet bestaande onderwerpen" is meteen "verdacht"
want je werd "beïnvloed" door de media en/of film industrie...
(bekende "kip of het ei" principe... wat was er eerder)
- vooral zoveel mogelijk de
media laten focussen op kinderlijk eenvoudige
UFO-Cases
die makkelijk -verklaren- zijn! en vervolgens klagen dat "DAT het niveau van de Ufologie" is.
Drs. Molewijk van Skepis gebruikte deze tactiek / truc ook toen hij met mij
in 1993 LIVE over UFO's bij RTL-4 "5 uur show" van Viola Holt was.
de illusie is dat de media steeds maar weer pseudo sceptici als
ontmasker-"specialisten" naar voren schuiven...
omdat ZIJ zogenaamd het "bewijs" hebben dat UFO's "allemaal" vergissingen,
bedrog, psychologisch dwalingen, Venus/Jupiter, luchtballonnen,
laserstralen op wolken etc. etc. zijn, ZONDER te melden dat er een groot
verschil is tussen -MELDING- ... en de UFO ...
Een -melding- moet nog onderzocht worden
(!) en verdient
niet -meteen- predikaat UFO!
maar deze -nuancering- staat in de weg van hun strategie:
"UFO’s zijn allemaal onzin" en die "paar" echte UFOs die dat niet zijn,
vallen bij luie stoel critici ("arm chair sceptics") standaard onder:
"voor ons -nog- onbekende natuurverschijnselen"
ALLE gegevens waaruit af te leiden valt dat het intelligent gedrag vertoond:
zoals vliegroute, snelheid, versnelling, interactie met bvb. piloten, EM-effecten,
fysiologische effecten, geluid, aantasting / afdrukken in grond & vegetatie (CE2) etc.
worden STANDAARD stelselmatig door UFO-pseudo-sceptici genegeerd, ontkend,
verdraaid & bagataliseerd.
Er valt zogenaamd "niets" te leren, het is ongeïdentificeerd:
en als het ongeïdentificeerd is, "dan weet je ook niets" (...)
we weten "niets" om conclusies te -mogen- trekken.
Onderzoeken dat er (diverse) onconventionele antwoorden
oplossingen KUNNEN zijn, is hun TAAK niet!
dus liever
afkraken & "onmogelijk" roepen dan dat je nòg meer kan onderzoeken.
- een
"sceptische" deskundige of wetenschapper die een aura heeft van:
"ik weet wat er zoal te koop is in de wereld van nuchtere erkende wetenschap"
alsof
hij/zij "ALLES" weet wat er ontdekken valt in (conventionele)
wetenschap.
STEL ...
Stel je leest ALLE bijzondere reguliere nuchtere wetenschappelijk -erkende- rapporten,
dossiers, boeken, artikelen, publicaties in erkende wetenschapsbladen VAN:
industrie, universiteiten, (declassified top secret) militaire projecten, multinationals etc. etc.
UIT DE HELE WERELD (inclusief Rusland Japan & China) van de afgelopen 5 jaar ...
stel je zou dat - allemaal - willen lezen !!! ...
dan ben je minimaal 80 jaar
bezig
met lezen ZONDER te slapen
!!!
dan te bedenken dat je nog niet eens iets FYSIEK / CONCREET -zelf-
gecheckt hebt of het echt wel klopt (zoals een echte scepticus dat hoort te doen) ...
Want sjoemelen, belangen & fraude bestaat ook in de reguliere conventionele wetenschap!
en
dan hebben we het nog NIET gehad over ALLE grenswetenschappen
wereldwijd,
dissidenten binnen de wetenschap die baanbrekend
onderzoek gedaan hebben
...
"daar heb je al helemaal geen tijd voor
(of geen zin in) ...
ook al blijkt dat een DEEL van de grens-wetenschappen
decennia jaren later pas erkenning krijgt
!!!
NU SNAPT U MISSCHIEN WAAROM IK HEEL HARD GA LACHEN !
als UFO-pseudo-sceptici (incl. Astronaut Wubbe Ockels) stellig reageren:
"Als het echt wat was, dan had ik het wel geweten"
Zieliger kan het haast niet ...
NOG zieliger is dat meeste -redacties- van mainstream media
te vaak klakkeloos deze zogenaamde "nuchtere wetenschappelijke adviezen"
overnemen
en daarom niet verder hoeven kijken
/
onderzoeken.
Dit verklaart het zeer lage niveau van
de mainstream-media als het over UFO's
gaat.
Vervolgens gebruiken diezelfde UFO-pseudo-sceptici het argument dat
"er weinig zinnigs
te vinden is
in de media over UFO's..."
kijk DAT is nou pure cirkel-redeneren ...
Spelen ze dat ze dom zijn ?
of zijn ze echt dom ?
Wat is dan erger ??? (...)
eindconclusie:
de manier zoals er met UFO informatie wordt omgesprongen is vaak
interessanter
dan de UFO zelf ...
Wat hebben een DEEL van de
-echte- UFO's met ET's vandoen?
De ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesis (ofwel ETH for short) is een heel bekende
hypothese in UFO-wereld, als je dan in gedachten hebt dat bij veel waarnemingen
het klaarblijkelijk gaat (citaat uit het SEPRA rapport:)
"completely unknown flying machines with exceptional
performances that are guided by a artificial intelligence" dan is ETH als
één van de MOGELIJKE antwoorden niet zo'n grote verrassing.... TOCH ???
- ATTENTION
UFO-ET-SCEPTICS -
A - HYPOTHESIS - means according a impartial unprejudiced dictionary:
A proposal intended to explain -certain facts- or observations
A concept that is not -yet- verified (several causes) but
that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena!
A message expressing an opinion based on -PARTIAL- evidence!
Pseudo sceptics IGNORES systematically the DIFFERENCE between
an (easy) "ET-believe" of UFO-eyewitnesses AND
a carefully thought over, evaluated, considered -ET-Hypothesis ! -
of thousands independent autonomous UFO-INVESTIGATORS worldwide!
lucky for the armchair pseudo sceptics that the "free" mainstream media
talks mostly about a "believe" not the FACTS ...
if the FACTS does not fit in the DOGMA of "science" than the road to "answers"
are MADE easy for sceptic minds (including the editorial
staffs of the mainstream media)
WHO is really guilty of wishful thinking ???
investigate...
with an open detective mindset or choose the
EASY road:
by downplaying the UFO-subject ... make a childish bad
summarize:
(mostly mark, copy paste) of OTHER
subjective summarizes ...
and thinking that you are a "good" sceptic ...
and the mainstream media (editorial staffs) BELIEVES that this is "okay"
or "good enough" to ease their minds ! ... it fits between the commercials,
easy to swallow quotes ... easy to comprehend that "need no further explanation"
THAT is the mindtrap of our thought-prison: THINKING that we are "free"
John Kuhles
www.watunietmagweten.nl
![]()
'must-have' media-players for this site:
Windows Media Player 9
(or higher)
+
search for
a the free basic
RealMedia-Player
at "downloads" on
www.real.com
deze site gebruikt, this site uses
True Type Fonts:
install(eer) het/it in
C:\WINDOWS\FONTS