|
Don-Phillips : US Air Force
Mr. Don Phillips: Lockheed Skunkworks,
Don Phillips, Lockheed Skunkworks, USAF, and CIA Contractor Don Phillips was in the Air Force at Las Vegas Air Force Base during an event when UFOs were seen moving at enormous speeds near Mt. Charleston, northwest of Las Vegas. In addition, he worked with Kelly Johnson at the Lockheed Skunkworks — on design and construction of the U-2 and the SR-71 Blackbird. He testifies that we not only have these extraterrestrial devices, but have also achieved tremendous technological advances from their study. He states that in the 1950s and 1960s, NATO did research into the origin of ET races, and disseminated reports to the leaders of various countries. Mr. Phillips further states that there are records and filmed documentation of meetings in California in 1954 between ETs and leaders of the USA. He lists a few of the technologies we were able to develop because of the ETs: computer chips, lasers, night vision, bulletproof vests, and concludes, “Are these ET people hostile? Well, if they were hostile, with their weaponry they could have destroyed us a long time ago — or could have done some damage.” Mr. Phillips now develops technologies that can help eliminate environmental pollutants and reduce the need for fossil fuels: energy generation systems that use natural energies from planet Earth. DP: Mr. Don Phillips SG: Dr. Steven Greer DP: So Angels Peak was a classified radar installation. And, it’s, a lot of radar installations, as we know them, are up in the middle of no where. We would monitor the aircraft coming from Las Vegas into Area 51 or whatever passed by. And, it was whatever passed by that became most interesting one night, in 1966, to ‘67. That night, I heard a lot of commotion about 1:00 in the morning. We were at 8,000 feet; the radar domes were at 10,500, approximately. So I decided to get up and walked up to the main road, and up near my office. I got to the area where the fellows were standing- there was a group of about five people- and they were looking up in the air. And, I looked up in the air and saw these objects, lighted objects, moving at tremendous speeds… Right at that instant I saw these things making acute angles and traveling, I would estimate 3,000 to 4,000 miles per hour. And, then immediately making acute turns. I knew that they weren’t ours… And, then, all of a sudden, they seemed to group, from what would be hundreds of miles in the sky to the west. And they came into a circle, rotated into a circle, and then disappeared. And, I thought, wow, what a show. So, the security Sergeant happened to be on duty. And, we all looked at each other and said, gee, this is really something. And, he said, well, we shouldn’t really say anything about this. Well, I had a buddy that was chief radar operator named Anthony Kasar… He was almost as white as
a sheet. He took one step down the steps and he looked at me and he said, did
you see those? And, I said, yeah, we’ve been watching them- some of the fellows
have been watching them for the last four to five minutes. And, I’ve seen them
for a little more than 90 seconds. He says, we saw them on the radar screen and
we documented them. He says, they are not bogeys. They are not apparitions. They
are real solid objects. And, of course, they would have to be in order to get a
fix with radar, the kind of radar we used there, it would have to be a solid
object. And, it’s not that we tracked them with the radar- they would go in and
out of the signal and register that way. He finally documented that there were
six to seven. The speeds that we estimated were also estimated by the radar
operators and their scopes. DP: They estimated, around, 3,800 to 4,200 miles per hour equivalent, ground speed. These things are darting across the sky. First they look like a star. And then they move, in any direction or make any kind of a straight line, or just hover. … These UFOs were huge. And they would just come to a stop and do a 60 degree, 45 degree, 10 degree turn, after stopping. And, then immediately reverse this action. … SG: Had you heard of anti-gravity propulsion systems being worked on while you were at Lockheed Skunkworks? DP: The propulsion system that you are asking about, I heard that it existed. But, the left hand never knew what the right hand was doing, and, for good reason. … We have records from 1954 that were meetings between our own leaders of this country and ET s here in California. And, as I understand it from the written documentation, we were asked if we would allow them to be here and do research. I have read that our reply was, well, how can we stop you, you are so advanced? And, I will say by this camera and this sound, that it was President Eisenhower that had this meeting. And, it was on film, sort of like what we are doing now. Bringing it up to date, the NATO report gave that there were 12 races. To make a final summary, they had to have contacts to go to these races in order to understand who they are, what they are doing, and what they could do. … Are these ET people hostile? Well, if they were hostile, with their weaponry they could have destroyed us a long time ago, or could have done some damage. … The reason they crashed is that their guidance mechanism was interrupted by our radar and by some equipment that we have. Even more validating for me was that one of our contract scientists for our private concern, Light City Technologies, Incorporated, worked with these technologies. He worked with a couple of those technologies while he was with a very prominent intelligence agency of the United States Government. The one person that I’ve talked to outside of the military or the government level is SG. And, the reason for that is because he makes it the professional approach, which is more in line with the way we were in the military. About the ET lenses: there were some eyeball coverings that allowed the people inside the craft that made the journey across space to see in the minimal light that we know is now present during space travel. These lenses magnified light, but also brought in a certain type of clarity. And, my reason for mentioning this was that it was Earth doctors and specialists that got them into the removal and study of these lenses. I think a lot of this has been well documented by Colonel Corso. You know, who was there with him? Well, there were a lot of people there with him. But a lot of the things that are said in the book by Colonel Corso, I can verify, corroborated by people that I have worked with and do work with now. So, I can say what I know about it is very true. The pathway that it took, that’s another story. We talk about hidden technologies and why don’t they let people know about it? Well, they hide it from the public. Well, hey, there is probably a good reason for some of it. The Government didn’t understand it themselves. Being in the Air Force, maybe we didn’t fully know what it was. Take those technologies from Roswell, it took a while to figure out how they worked before we knew what to make from it and then how to get it into industry, how can it benefit the people. … I learned one thing from an associate scientist- somebody for whom I have the greatest, the highest respect- who was with the CIA. He says the first thing we want to determine is who is turning the wheels on any project-this is what I did when I was with the CIA. You see, who is turning the wheels? What is the motivation? Why is it being done? I asked, right after we first talked, why is Dr. Steven Greer doing this? I’ve done my research- maybe a lot of it. And, I’ve watched what’s happening. And, you’ve been very dedicated to what you are doing, and professional. That’s why I am here tonight. That is why I am speaking with you… Well, SG, one of the purposes for founding this technology corporation that I did in 1998 was to bring forth these technologies that can help get rid of the toxins -- that can clean the air, that help get rid of the need for so much fossil fuel or help it become more efficient. Yes, it is time. I can tell you, personally, that it has already started. And I can prove what we have come up with. We can prove it…
dat is wat de meeste journalisten steeds maar weer vragen: "gelooft u in ..." alsof het allemaal maar "vaag" is alsof er "niets" valt te -weten-
of spelen ze dom ? (...) wat is dan erger ?
daardoor intelligentere vragen gaan stellen !
small selection of the 450+ testimonies of deep insiders
(dear media, if only 1 below here is true, it is enough!) (patience with loading, geduld met laden) |
What are the most important &convincing (ignored) UFO-FACTS ?(selection by John Kuhles)
(CIA-FBI-NSA-ONI-Pentagon etc.) released through the Freedom Of Information Act: www.caus.org & www.blackvault.com
02. Worldwide UFO-testemonies from Militairy-Police-Pilots-Radar-Operators+Air-Traffic-Controllers www.narcap.org - www.prufos.co.uk - www.disclosureproject.org
(M.O. Defense 1999-2002) 06. USAF Blue Book Special Report 14 (1969)U.S. Airforce Project 'Blue Book' Huge Catalog of 1,500 UFO's Project BLUE BOOK UFO Unknowns (xxxxx.pdf file: 683Kb) Acrobat Reader needed
07. United Nations UFO-Report (14-july-1978):
08. European Parlement UFO-Report (1990-1993)
10. Worldwide UFO-films & foto's & Physical Trace Cases (CE II)Center for Physical Trace Research To the best of our knowledge, Ted R. Phillips is the best specialty researcheron the subject of UFO trace cases in the world, and no website covers the subject better. Features include mission statement, current cases, video clips & video cam, background, media updates and cases of "high strangeness" (one of our favorite USAF terms!).
11. 'The UFO Briefing Document - Best Available Evidence'dat in 1995 aan zo'n duizend personen wereldwijd is gestuurd en de Sturrock Workshop1997, die beide werden gesponsord door miljonair Laurance Rockefeller.
Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions)
in section B-39
of the DoD (Department of Defense)
Since July 2001 the US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)is for the first time including a paragraph about UFO reports in its Aeronautical Information Manual ( AIM).UFO reporting Air Force instructions are in Section 6, par. 7-6-4, Safety, Accident, and Hazard Reports
13. American Institute of Astronautics, Kuenttner UFO-Rapport: 1970 UFO-GOVERNMENT-HEARINGS 29-July-1968
On March 10, 1982:the House of Lords held its second debate on UFOs, still coming to no definitive conclusion.
1983: The British government starts to release DECLASSIFIED UFO files for the first time.
AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA STILL IGNORES THE CONTENT of these Government, AirForce, Navy & Military declassified Top Secret UFO-Documents thus keeping the general public uninformed
WHY ??? real freedom of information is needed in a true democracy, no freedom of information creates a fake democracy! no freedom of information = no real free CHOICE !
Above Top Secret Timothy Good This was one of the first books that I read and it is still one of the best. Tim Good presents his points of view in a very clear and concise manner. The book deals with the way in which various governments have tried to cover-upthe UFO phenomena from the public. The book contains loads of smaller cases from around the globe from mostly military personnel and pilots, people who would in general be less likely to lie, mis-identify etc. regarding the objects that they have been seeing. Most of these cases are backed up by official documents and testimony from the various governments and witnesses. I believe that this was one of the first books (if not the 1st) to publish details of the Majestic-12 documents.
|


CLICK ON / KLIK OP ONDERSTAANDE PLAATJE:
Use Translator to translate into YOUR language
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/Dutch.html

wat is de beste houding tegenover
"dubieuze" & controversiële
"Real-X-Files" info ???
o.a. -standaard- SLEUTELZINNEN gebruiken
(die Stichting Skepsis amper gebruikt)
in communicatie met wie dan ook, voor een
OPEN & EERLIJKE (!)
discussie (eventueel uitwisseling):
01.
"voor zover mijn kennis reikt ..."
02.
"Als ik goed voorgelicht ben ... dan ..."
03.
"tot nu toe, is mij bekend dat ..."
04.
"Als mijn bronnen correct zijn ... dan ..."
05.
"zover ik kan oordelen over ..."
06.
"Als het 100% vrij is van desinformatie... dan ..."
07.
"Als het geen verborgen agenda's bevat... dan..."
08.
"zover het verifieerbaar & controleerbaar is dan..."
09.
"zolang het vrij is van zelfcensuur, dan ..."
10.
"Als maar een DEEL de waar is, dan ..."
11. "Als mijn bevattingsvermogen het toelaat, dan ..."
12. "Als het niet slecht & zwaar selectief is samengevat, dan ..."
13. "Als het vrij is van negatieve wishful thinking door (pseudo) sceptici, dan..."
14. "Als ik voldoende zin heb, tijd vrijmaak & moeite WIL doen, dan ..."
ze zijn zo "zeker" van zichzelf, dat ze de belangrijkste ingrediënt om
zichzelf een ECHTE scepticus te mogen noemen, missen, namelijk:
gezonde dosis zelf-twijfel !!!
UFO pseudo sceptici kennnen
geen grenzen in gemakzucht & arrogantie:
- als het
effe kan, graag liever niet moeite doen, om verder te kijken.
- slecht tot zeer slecht samenvatten
(meestal van ANDERE subjectieve samenvattingen)
- alleen het aannemelijke voor "waar" aannemen (en denken dat je
daarmee zekerheid
hebt)
- zoeken naar fouten om zo het -hele- onderwerp af te doen als "zie je wel"
dat het "allemaal" onzin is.
- film & media de schuld geven
dat "ZIJ de oorzaak zijn" dat er meer UFO-meldingen binnenkomen.
incest, verkrachting binnen het huwelijk,
wereldwijde pedofiele priesters, asbest affaire,
etc. etc.
"bestaan zeker ook niet" als de media & film er melding van maakt.
ALLE -nieuwe- meldingen van zogenaamde "niet bestaande onderwerpen" is meteen "verdacht"
want je werd "beïnvloed" door de media en/of film industrie...
(bekende "kip of het ei" principe... wat was er eerder)
- vooral zoveel mogelijk de
media laten focussen op kinderlijk eenvoudige
UFO-Cases
die makkelijk -verklaren- zijn! en vervolgens klagen dat "DAT het niveau van de Ufologie" is.
Drs. Molewijk van Skepis gebruikte deze tactiek / truc ook toen hij met mij
in 1993 LIVE over UFO's bij RTL-4 "5 uur show" van Viola Holt was.
de illusie is dat de media steeds maar weer pseudo sceptici als
ontmasker-"specialisten" naar voren schuiven...
omdat ZIJ zogenaamd het "bewijs" hebben dat UFO's "allemaal" vergissingen,
bedrog, psychologisch dwalingen, Venus/Jupiter, luchtballonnen,
laserstralen op wolken etc. etc. zijn, ZONDER te melden dat er een groot
verschil is tussen -MELDING- ... en de UFO ...
Een -melding- moet nog onderzocht worden
(!) en verdient
niet -meteen- predikaat UFO!
maar deze -nuancering- staat in de weg van hun strategie:
"UFO’s zijn allemaal onzin" en die "paar" echte UFOs die dat niet zijn,
vallen bij luie stoel critici ("arm chair sceptics") standaard onder:
"voor ons -nog- onbekende natuurverschijnselen"
ALLE gegevens waaruit af te leiden valt dat het intelligent gedrag vertoond:
zoals vliegroute, snelheid, versnelling, interactie met bvb. piloten, EM-effecten,
fysiologische effecten, geluid, aantasting / afdrukken in grond & vegetatie (CE2) etc.
worden STANDAARD stelselmatig door UFO-pseudo-sceptici genegeerd, ontkend,
verdraaid & bagataliseerd.
Er valt zogenaamd "niets" te leren, het is ongeïdentificeerd:
en als het ongeïdentificeerd is, "dan weet je ook niets" (...)
we weten "niets" om conclusies te -mogen- trekken.
Onderzoeken dat er (diverse) onconventionele antwoorden
oplossingen KUNNEN zijn, is hun TAAK niet!
dus liever
afkraken & "onmogelijk" roepen dan dat je nòg meer kan onderzoeken.
- een
"sceptische" deskundige of wetenschapper die een aura heeft van:
"ik weet wat er zoal te koop is in de wereld van nuchtere erkende wetenschap"
alsof
hij/zij "ALLES" weet wat er ontdekken valt in (conventionele)
wetenschap.
STEL ...
Stel je leest ALLE bijzondere reguliere nuchtere wetenschappelijk -erkende- rapporten,
dossiers, boeken, artikelen, publicaties in erkende wetenschapsbladen VAN:
industrie, universiteiten, (declassified top secret) militaire projecten, multinationals etc. etc.
UIT DE HELE WERELD (inclusief Rusland Japan & China) van de afgelopen 5 jaar ...
stel je zou dat - allemaal - willen lezen !!! ...
dan ben je minimaal 80 jaar
bezig
met lezen ZONDER te slapen
!!!
dan te bedenken dat je nog niet eens iets FYSIEK / CONCREET -zelf-
gecheckt hebt of het echt wel klopt (zoals een echte scepticus dat hoort te doen) ...
Want sjoemelen, belangen & fraude bestaat ook in de reguliere conventionele wetenschap!
en
dan hebben we het nog NIET gehad over ALLE grenswetenschappen
wereldwijd,
dissidenten binnen de wetenschap die baanbrekend
onderzoek gedaan hebben
...
"daar heb je al helemaal geen tijd voor
(of geen zin in) ...
ook al blijkt dat een DEEL van de grens-wetenschappen
decennia jaren later pas erkenning krijgt
!!!
NU SNAPT U MISSCHIEN WAAROM IK HEEL HARD GA LACHEN !
als UFO-pseudo-sceptici (incl. Astronaut Wubbe Ockels) stellig reageren:
"Als het echt wat was, dan had ik het wel geweten"
Zieliger kan het haast niet ...
NOG zieliger is dat meeste -redacties- van mainstream media
te vaak klakkeloos deze zogenaamde "nuchtere wetenschappelijke adviezen"
overnemen
en daarom niet verder hoeven kijken
/
onderzoeken.
Dit verklaart het zeer lage niveau van
de mainstream-media als het over UFO's
gaat.
Vervolgens gebruiken diezelfde UFO-pseudo-sceptici het argument dat
"er weinig zinnigs
te vinden is
in de media over UFO's..."
kijk DAT is nou pure cirkel-redeneren ...
Spelen ze dat ze dom zijn ?
of zijn ze echt dom ?
Wat is dan erger ??? (...)
eindconclusie:
de manier zoals er met UFO informatie wordt omgesprongen is vaak
interessanter
dan de UFO zelf ...
Wat hebben een DEEL van de
-echte- UFO's met ET's vandoen?
De ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesis (ofwel ETH for short) is een heel bekende
hypothese in UFO-wereld, als je dan in gedachten hebt dat bij veel waarnemingen
het klaarblijkelijk gaat (citaat uit het SEPRA rapport:)
"completely unknown flying machines with exceptional
performances that are guided by a artificial intelligence" dan is ETH als
één van de MOGELIJKE antwoorden niet zo'n grote verrassing.... TOCH ???
- ATTENTION
UFO-ET-SCEPTICS -
A - HYPOTHESIS - means according a impartial unprejudiced dictionary:
A proposal intended to explain -certain facts- or observations
A concept that is not -yet- verified (several causes) but
that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena!
A message expressing an opinion based on -PARTIAL- evidence!
Pseudo sceptics IGNORES systematically the DIFFERENCE between
an (easy) "ET-believe" of UFO-eyewitnesses AND
a carefully thought over, evaluated, considered -ET-Hypothesis ! -
of thousands independent autonomous UFO-INVESTIGATORS worldwide!
lucky for the armchair pseudo sceptics that the "free" mainstream media
talks mostly about a "believe" not the FACTS ...
if the FACTS does not fit in the DOGMA of "science" than the road to "answers"
are MADE easy for sceptic minds (including the editorial
staffs of the mainstream media)
WHO is really guilty of wishful thinking ???
investigate...
with an open detective mindset or choose the
EASY road:
by downplaying the UFO-subject ... make a childish bad
summarize:
(mostly mark, copy paste) of OTHER
subjective summarizes ...
and thinking that you are a "good" sceptic ...
and the mainstream media (editorial staffs) BELIEVES that this is "okay"
or "good enough" to ease their minds ! ... it fits between the commercials,
easy to swallow quotes ... easy to comprehend that "need no further explanation"
THAT is the mindtrap of our thought-prison: THINKING that we are "free"
John Kuhles
www.watunietmagweten.nl
![]()
'must-have' media-players for this site:
Windows Media Player 9
(or higher)
+
search for
a the free basic
RealMedia-Player
at "downloads" on
www.real.com
deze site gebruikt, this site uses
True Type Fonts:
install(eer) het/it in
C:\WINDOWS\FONTS

Richtlijnen-Live-Web-Radio-Verbodenniews-nl.txt